Perfecting Performance Management

 -  6/21/11

Talent managers need not redesign the entire process, but instead simply chip away factors that cause the most pain.


Few talent processes are as powerful or as widely despised as performance management. The steps to align employees with corporate goals, coach them to higher performance and assess their accomplishments often elicit an unending stream of complaints from managers and employees alike. Talent managers should ignore the siren’s calls to eliminate the performance review, and instead create a process that’s guided by science, easy to use and features clear accountability.

Thanks to 60 years of psychology research, we have information to set goals that create higher motivation and drive performance. Science tells us that:

More difficult goals produce higher performance: We increase our effort as a goal becomes more challenging. The old performance management maxim of “three regular goals and a stretch goal” doesn’t cut it. Today it should be four stretch goals.

Goals motivate better when they coincide with self-interest: When we believe a goal can help us earn, learn or realize other personal objectives, we’ll be more motivated to complete it. This doesn’t mean employees should set their own goals. In fact, allowing them to do so can easily reduce the power of the first point.

Fewer goals are better than many: The more goals we have, the less effort we can give to each. Science doesn’t tell us the right number of goals, but my experience is few of us have more than five truly important goals in any given year.

Many parts of the typical performance management system add complexity to the manager’s life without adding value. You can eliminate many traditional bells and whistles to make your process easier and more efficient for your managers.

Encourage a one-page goal setting and review form: We can all agree it’s not about the form, but a complex, difficult-to-use form can poison the process for both managers and employees. The only form elements supported by science are a goal statement, metrics and a section to evaluate results. Anything else you want to include should be considered guilty until you prove it innocent.

Article Keywords:   performance management   performance review  


perfecting-performance-management

Related Articles

  •  

From the Network

Twitter Updates


Latest Media

Defining the Workplace of the Future, Part 3

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott explains how the millennial generation is leading the charge of the ultra collaborative workplace, and how traditional models of work might be squandering their strengths.

Defining the Workplace of the Future, Part 2

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott says the divided workplace of the governed and the governors is fading as technology enables a collaboration-based, peer-to-peer structure.

Defining the Workplace of the Future

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott describes how the “digital native” generation is changing the composition of the future workplace.

Leo Burnett’s Looming Talent Challenge

Jeff Tritt, executive vice president of people and culture at advertising giant Leo Burnett, talks of the talent challenges the agency faces in 2012 and beyond.

Use Analytics to Impart Change

Data from predictive analytics can help business stakeholders make decisions that positively affect business outcomes. Here’s how.