A New Look at Engagement

 -  10/21/11

Here are nine intangible elements of work that employees rank much higher than salary or perks on engagement surveys.

Engaged employees perform at 100 percent of their ability, but the most highly engaged employees perform at 122 percent. This was an assertion made during a Towers Perrin — now Towers Watson — webinar called “Leadership Drives Engagement and Retention” a few years ago.

Let’s do the math. Every employee who’s elevated from engaged to highly engaged is expected to add 22 percent more productivity, potentially resulting in the equivalent of one more full-time employee for every five new highly engaged employees.

Employee engagement has always been of interest to talent leaders, and the need to drive engagement is only growing in importance. During the tumultuous economic downturn, people were happy just to have a job, but now companies are seeing signs of movement in the market as recruiters come knocking.

There’s a high cost to low engagement and burnout. A Families and Work Institute report titled “Overwork in America” noted in 2005 that people are overworked more than ever, and react badly to stress and longer hours. Organizations with low engagement will also experience higher turnover, lost productivity, transition chaos, loss of critical knowledge and skills, disrupted succession plans and less profitability and business value.

Traditionally, companies have used carrots or sticks to motivate or engage employees. They offer raises, bonuses and other perks as carrots. They also try sticks such as performance quotas tied to disciplinary action, demerits and loss of privileges. However, these things don’t drive engagement. Sticks tend to create resentment rather than top performance. Compensation and other carrots are good, but highly engaged employees expect more.

Here are nine key drivers of engagement as identified by The Bailey Group. Most organizations have at least some of these, but are missing a few. These intangible elements of work rank much higher than salary or perks on employee engagement surveys. Individually, these drivers can indicate strengths or concerns, but all nine must be considered to determine a complete picture of engagement. Notice how money isn’t even mentioned.

Article Keywords:   engagement   productivity   employee engagement   development  


a-new-look-at-engagement

Related Articles

  •  

From the Network

Twitter Updates


Latest Media

Defining the Workplace of the Future, Part 3

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott explains how the millennial generation is leading the charge of the ultra collaborative workplace, and how traditional models of work might be squandering their strengths.

Defining the Workplace of the Future, Part 2

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott says the divided workplace of the governed and the governors is fading as technology enables a collaboration-based, peer-to-peer structure.

Defining the Workplace of the Future

Strategies 2012 keynote speaker Don Tapscott describes how the “digital native” generation is changing the composition of the future workplace.

Leo Burnett’s Looming Talent Challenge

Jeff Tritt, executive vice president of people and culture at advertising giant Leo Burnett, talks of the talent challenges the agency faces in 2012 and beyond.

Use Analytics to Impart Change

Data from predictive analytics can help business stakeholders make decisions that positively affect business outcomes. Here’s how.